大洋洲研究中心副主任许少民在《当代韩国》期刊发表合作论文

          中山大学大洋洲研究中心副主任许少民副教授与南京大学中国南海研究协同创新中心研究助理李梓蓉合作在国内主流学术期刊《当代韩国》2026年第2期发表题为“中美战略竞争背景下美韩核潜艇合作的逻辑、前景和影响研究”的学术论文。这篇论文是许少民副教授“奥库斯（AUKUS）”研究项目的衍生研究成果。

       《当代韩国》为中国社会科学院主管，社会科学文献出版社、中国社会科学院韩国研究中心主办的学术期刊（季刊），创刊于1993年，致力于韩国及朝鲜半岛相关问题研究，为中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价A刊扩展期刊。

         许少民和李梓蓉合作发表论文的中英文摘要如下所示：

          内容提要：在中美战略竞争背景下，美国借助关键军事技术转移动员“印太”盟伴国家强化对华“拒止性威慑”的趋向日益明显。本轮美国和韩国之间的核潜艇合作表明双方在同盟困境下围绕责任分担达成新共识：美国利用核潜艇交易对韩国施加战略牵引，笼络其打造更加紧密的海上慑华军事同盟；韩国则出于强化安全保障和提升战略地位考虑，迎合美方的“印太战略”部署。虽然美韩核潜艇合作仍有变数，但反映出美国借此加速在“第一岛链”推进包括黄海、东海、南海和台海在内的“四海联动”战略布局的企图，此举很可能会冲击东北亚乃至亚太地区的安全格局，加剧东北亚地区阵营化趋势，最终导致中国周边战略环境的复杂化。

          Abstract: As strategic competition between China and the US grinds on, the US has become increasingly active to bring its allies through the transfer of critical military technologies to bear on strengthening deterrence against China. Trump’s latest approval of South Korea’s long-pursuit dream of building nuclear submarine reflects a new consensus of burden-sharing between US and the South Korea in the backdrop of US-China strategy competition. By leveraging US-South Korea cooperation on nuclear-powered submarines, Washington aims to exert strategic influence over Seoul and draw it into an emerging US-led maritime alliance dedicated to deterring China by denial. Meanwhile, it sheds light on South Korea’s key objectives of strengthening deterrence credibility and strategic autonomy for the sake of its security on one hand, and enhancing its strategic profile within the US-led “lattice” alliance system on the other. Although the US-South Korea nuclear submarine cooperation is supposed to encounter significant hurdles, this signature program indeed bespeaks America’s determination in seeking its denial strategy against China along the First Island Chain, including the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea, and the Taiwan Strait. The cascade effects of US-South Korea nuclear submarine cooperation warrant attention, as it is likely to reshape the security order of Northeast Asia and the broader Asia-Pacific region, intensify bloc-based dynamics in the Northeast Asia, and further complicate and even deteriorate China’s surrounding strategic environment.